I'll probably be voting for John McCain on "Super Tuesday." Why? There are several reasons but it really comes down to the issues and I find that I agree with his positions more than most of the other candidates. But it also comes down to the overall consistency of his message. Unlike some other presidential candidates (Romney, Hillary, etc.) he hasn't come across as somebody who has changed his core positions on a regular basis. Here are some issues where I agree with John McCain.
Immigration - Contrary to popular conservative opinion I believe that McCain actually sided with Ronald Reagan on the issue of immigration and that Reagan was pro-amnesty in some cases. As Reagan once said, "The legalization provisions in this act will go far to improve the lives of a class of individuals who now must hide in the shadows, without access to many of the benefits of a free and open society. Very soon many of these men and women will be able to step into the sunlight and, ultimately, if they choose, they may become Americans" (link). I respect McCain's consistency on this issue though it has made him the political enemy of people like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.
Bipartisanship - McCain has had the rare ability to reach beyond party lines as he has been endorsed by both the New York Times (link) and Joe Lieberman (link). This will make it difficult for him to win the Republican nomination but will help him during the general election.
Torture - Since McCain is the only politician running for office who has actually been tortured I think it gives him additional credibility. McCain is strongly against using torture during interrogation techniques and I agree with him on this issue. As he states, "The abuse of prisoners harms, not helps, our war effort." (link).
Economy - The U.S. Congress has spent over $70 of pork since 2005. However, McCain actually has not sponsored any earmarks since he's been a Senator (link), setting a fiscally conservative example for a financially indulgent Congress.
Iraq - Should we have gone into Iraq to begin with? Honestly I don't know. The war may have been based on faulty intelligence or a heightened amount of fear after 9/11, but either way both Democrats and Republicans voted on the intelligence they saw, and both parties chose to send our troops into war. To argue that only one party believed that Saddam had WMD's to me is misleading. For example, in 2002, Al Gore said, "We know that [Hussein] has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country". Also in 2002, Sen. Ted Kennedy said, "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction" (link).
Now that we are in Iraq, is an immediate pullout a good idea? I personally don't think so. Iraqis are used to having some sort of powerful figure govern over them - be it Saddam Hussein or the United States - and I tend to think that leaving Iraq would create a vacuum that an ill-intending group like Al Qaeda would love to fill. A good friend of mine is currently serving in Iraq and I believe that our military is filled with good people like him who continue help in the protection of Iraqi citizens, the training of the Iraq army and the building of the Iraq democracy.
As Joe Lieberman puts it, "There are many fine people running for President. Many of them are good friends of mine. But I have concluded -- and I hope you will, as well -- that John McCain is the candidate who can best reunite our country and lead us to victory in the war against Islamist terrorism" (link).
Who will you be voting for this election?
Recent Comments